How intelligent were dinosaurs?

Maybe some other dinosaurs were more intelligent than others. That means some dinosaurs could make more versatile things than others. But there must be some reasons why the brain and especially connections in the brain started forming. More neural connections and the ability to take the neural signals back and analyze things made some dinosaurs superior to others. 

But when we are thinking about the T-Rex itself there was one thing that could explain why T-Rex was so bloodthirsty. That thing is that information travels only in one direction in its nervous system. That means T-Rex couldn't resist its prey. And it's true, that means something interesting, T-Rex attacked other dinosaurs always when it saw them. So in this case the nervous system of T-Rex acts like an insect neural system. And that means the behavior of T-Rex was like some giant insect. When it smelled its prey it always attacked it. 

In the movie "Jurassic Park" we can see that T-Rex attacks cars and other vehicles. Sometimes I wonder would that thing happen in real life. Would T-Rex attack the thing that it has ever seen before? When T-Rex bites the car it tastes metal and rubber, and the question is would that thing make T-Rex stop its attack? In that movie, T-Rex acts like a dog. And when we think that T-Rex was far more primitive than a dog or lion, we must ask if would real T-Rex have the capacity to make those things. Did that monster  prowl its prey, or did it attack immediately? 

How intelligent were dinosaurs? That is one of the basic questions that repeat again and again. Or maybe we should ask: what is intelligence? When we are trying to compare dinosaurs' intelligence with the intelligence of bacteria, we might say that bacteria make some things faster than dinosaurs. 

Or dinosaurs might run faster than humans. They might bite harder, but humans can make weapons that stop even T-Rex. If dinosaur attacks modern humans, human can use anti-tank missiles against them. Humans can also tell other humans that they saw T-Rex. They can take an image of that thing and send it to the net. And that gives everybody possible to prepare for T-Rex attacks. T-Rex might seem horrifying but the fact is that dinosaur is not very clever. 

It doesn't probably even know how to attack the concrete house. And that thing can cause terrible damage to the teeth of the T-Rex. Even if that lizard had 5000 kilograms of force in its jaws the steel-concreate can stop that attack. So does T-Rex learn and go away or does it continue its attacks until the last tooth is gone? 

Intelligence means flexibility. In the case of dinosaurs, the dinosaur can elude trees while it runs. And always when the dinosaur is running. And something comes in front of it. It decides whether should it eat that thing. Or elude the thing it sees. Those things are programmed in its nervous system. 

But did dinosaurs learn new things? Did individual dinosaurs learn to avoid certain drinking places, because some T-Rex used them? Or did that smaller dinosaur go to that source again and again? And then the drinking ends when that dinosaur escaped the T-Rex? Or did that T-Rex come to the source a little bit earlier? And then it took lunch at the same time as it drinks water. 

Human intelligence is flexible. We can make things like clothes and fire and use many things. So in the case of intelligence flexibility means the ability to put something in memory, and then connect those memories with similar cases. When human sees snow human knows to put warm clothes on. And that means certain behaviors escalate to other similar cases. 

The question is did the thing that dinosaurs couldn't learn new things seal their fate after the meteor impact? If dinosaurs didn't know how to search for food under the snow that started to rain after the meteor impact formed large cloud areas in the atmosphere causing nuclear winter. That would end their life. 

When dinosaurs who were left alive from the great tsunami faced a suddenly changing environment they faced the problem of how to get food. In normal cases, some dinosaurs lived in cold areas. But there was always time to prepare cold. Nature prepared those animals for the next season. And when everything suddenly changed nothing prepared dinosaurs for that thing. 

The machines like chess programs can play chess better than humans. The fact is that AI always plays chess more effectively than humans. But then we must realize that chess computers can only play chess. Those computers make nothing else.

They just play chess. And that's it. Maybe humans would play chess the same way very effectively if they just don't make anything else than play chess. Those kinds of things are called RISC systems. They are like pocket calculators. Pocket calculators are fast and effective systems. If you want to make drawings pocket calculators are effective anymore. You need a more flexible system. 

Computers are a little bit slower to use. But computers are more flexible systems. If we want to connect more uses and abilities for some system that makes it slower than a one-mission computer. But those computers are a little bit slower to use for base calculations than one-mission pocket calculators. The cloud-based solutions are making computers more flexible than ever before. 

Is the political field more radical than ever before?

We get more information than ever before. But we have a new ability that was impossible before the internet. We can select the information that we read. And we must not read anything that supports our opinions. This thing causes polarization in the information that we get.

If we are reading only things that please us. That thing distorts information. And we might believe that all people we see are members of some kind of street gang or are working in some kind of political movement.  

Our change to select the information that we get makes it possible that we can avoid discussions about that thing. We might see only things that support our opinions. And if somebody criticizes our opinions, we can just close that person out of our social environment. 

The political field is more polarized and radical than ever before. Or this is the thing that many of us believe. Many people saw this when Donald Trump refused to accept the result of the elections. 

And then Trump called his supporters to the streets. The media is full of stories about the problems foreigners are causing and many pictures of armed protesters attacking Congress houses in the USA. But are those things that we see only virtual effects? 

Are things like street gangs a new problem? Those things are been here a long time before us. The only information that is delivered about those things was in crime stories and crime magazines. 

But social media brought that thing in front of our eyes. The fact is that there is a new thing called social media. Social media brought things like political radicalism to common knowledge. And another thing is that the political parties are closer to each other than ever before.

So the only differences between political movements are the attitudes toward weapon-carrying and foreigners. The thing is that the political field is closer to the center than ever before.  

That means the things that brought votes for candidates in the last elections escalated over the entire political field. So the only differences in party programs are highlighted. And that thing feeds the vision of political polarization. Things like an attack on Congress are frightening, and those things seem very dramatic. And dramatic things interested people. 

The price of political campaigns is enormous. And that's why nobody can confess that they have no change. Nobody can leave the game, because the price of those campaigns is so high. So candidates must go to the end even if they see that they have no chance to win. 

When we are thinking about the American election system the candidate who wins the state gets all electors behind the winner. And that means differences in the votes are always artificial. There could be only a couple of votes that resolve the election. And that thing is one of the things, that people should understand when they talk about the American election system. 

When George W. Bush won the campaign in 2001, he won with five votes. Because the presidential campaigns are campaigns for electors there is the possibility that a person who gets fewer natural votes will be elected to president. 

The thing, that makes this possible is that. If the candidate gets more electors that candidate will be elected to president. The reason for that kind of system is that it denies that the president will not turn too strong. But when we are thinking about change. And especially with the internet and social media, we must realize that dramatic things are interesting. Professional journalists require money. 

So from the point of view of earning logic, the newspaper wants something that brings money to them. Even if we see some free newspapers or free media, we must understand that there is somebody who pays the price of that media. If that price is not collected from readers there must be some other thing that brings money to the cash of that newspaper. 

And one thing that brings money is commercials. But the problem with commercials is that people should see them and buy products. If nobody reads articles those advertisers are going to find some other platform for their marketing materials. 

And newspapers publish articles that are interesting to readers. If nobody reads the magazine it will face bankruptcy. So we might think that dramatic things are interesting things and dramatism grow sales. When virtual magazines are marketed people should always ask, "why somebody wants to buy the right to read that thing"?. 

Virtual workspaces are the thing that makes the space that publishers can use unlimited. In modern network-based publishing, the paper is not limiting the work or the writing's length.

 So virtual magazines have not limited anymore how many articles they publish. Virtual workspaces are the tool that allows writing things more freely than ever before. That means the people who are writing to the media must have more interesting stories than before. And that thing sometimes causes overstating in writing. 

Is it safe to stand on a giant's shoulders?

If we want to be prime movers we must dare to think independently. The man named Sir Isaac Newton was the man who created the first gravitational theory. Newton also explained that light had two forms particle and wave motion. But we forget one thing. 

When Newton started his career, there were no gravitational theories and Newtonian mechanics. Being a prime mover makes it possible that a person makes mistakes. But if the person is successful. That brings gold and glory to that person. And guess how many errors Newton made before he published some of his theories?

The key element in philosophy is just to learn to ask "why?".  We can always copy texts written by Popper or Aristotle. But when we try to create something new. We must dare to write something. That some famous philosophers did not write earlier. There is one thing that we must understand. Even the most famous philosophers once wrote their first text. 

Sir Isaac Newton said he made great things because he stood on the giant's shoulders. Then we might ask how safe is to stand on a giant's shoulder. Should we rather follow other people? Should we always follow other people's thoughts? 

Or repeat other people's ideas rather than make our ideas? So if we want to make something great, like some new theory we must dare to stand on the giant's shoulder. Maybe our ideas are sometimes unpractical. Or maybe, they are far away from possible. 

And that means people are telling us that our idea is not working. Or our new idea is not suitable for mass production. But otherwise, those ideas were ours. They were and are something that came to my mind. When we think about safe models like writing some other people's ideas some other people like my own teachers could or some other philosophers might ask, "should I loan Plato's book, or should I read your thoughts?". 

The fact is that I was in the philosophy course, and if I wanted to pass that course, I must write my ideas. I know that everybody can copy texts made by Aristotle, Newton, or Voltaire. But fewer people can write their own opinions and justify them by using accepted rhetoric. This is the idea of philosophy. What if Newton thought that he must follow other people's texts? And what if that man just summarized them? 

The fact is that nobody ever heard of Sir Isaac Newton, the man who invented Newton's telescope, gravitation, and derivative-integral calculations. Nobody ever heard the idea that the universe is like a clock and God would not willingly intervene in what's going on here. Without being willing to make their texts, men and women like Newton would be the only man on earth. 

When we are thinking about people who sympathize with the Russian attack on Ukraine. And their connection with vaccine resistance, we can say that vaccines can protect people against biological weapons. But that's only my own opinion. The thing is that the philosophical way to think is different than everyday thinking. philosophical thinking is deeper than regular thinking. And the key question is: does something has some kind of thing that is not open to us? 

The classic example of a philosophical way to think is this. When our professor comes to the class there is a glass of water on his table. Then we must ask a question: is that liquid water? And if there is water, why that glass is on the table? 

When we look at people, who are against their benefit, we must ask about the motive for that kind of behavior. Why did somebody do something? Whose benefit do the anti-vaccine attitudes serve? 

Why that thing causes so big polemics? Why do those things raise so strong opinions? Those things are interesting. 

https://bigthink.com/thinking/shoulders-of-qiants/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Researchers found the genome that makes the human brain.

By observing anomalies, researchers can find how the brain works and forms. When there is some kind of anomaly in brain structure researchers can make the genetic map of a person. And then look for differences in the DNA sequences that control the brain and its development. 

The brain is morphing throughout its entire life. That means connections inside living adults' brains, are not fixed. 

The brain can form new connections during its entire life. And that allows us to learn new things even if we are adults. 

Locating those sequences is an easy thing. The DNA sequences that control brain advancement are the most rarely used base pairs. 

The neural network in the brain morphs all the time. And that thing allows us to learn new things. 

But the same ability makes us forget things. The brain always removes unnecessary memory marks. 

The reason why our brain forgets things is that it doesn't have to grow its database enormously. And if some memories are not needed. Brain removes it. 

The reason for that is if there are lot of unnecessary data the brain must check those cells anyway. And large data mass makes them slower. 

Even if the brain can store and handle enormous data mass. There are limits to its storage capacity. And when the brain removes unused memory, it makes space for new skills. 

Researchers found a genome that coordinates brain growth. That thing allows them to create mice that have similar neural structures to humans. This makes it possible to research learning and other kinds of processes in the brain. But those genomes can also make it possible to create animals that can learn faster and more effectively than natural animals. 

Finding the genome that controls the development of the brain is the thing that can also make the "monkey soldiers", Stalin's mad dream real. The thing is that researchers can develop new types of species that have certain abilities. And that thing makes genetic research very dangerous. 

That kind of research makes it possible to create also a new type of pet and animal helpers. Those animal helpers can make jobs for their owners. There is a possibility that pets with improved brain capacity can assist people who have limitations. 

The ability to connect human brain cells to mice and make them form new networks also makes it possible to connect animals like dogs or wolves cells to the human brain. Those animals are following their leaders. 

And if those brain areas that are making them act a certain way in the pack would copy to the human brain, that allows the creation of obedient humans who follow their leaders all the time. But the same technology that lab-grown human neurons will inject into the brain can fix large-scale neural damage in the case of accidents. 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/lab-grown-human-cells-form-working-circuits-in-rat-brains-20221012/

https://www.science.org/content/article/human-neurons-merge-rat-brain-control-senses

https://scitechdaily.com/adult-brain-structure-is-not-fixed-scientists-discover-depression-treatment-increases-brain-connectivity/amp

/https:/scitechdaily.com/scientists-uncover-the-gene-responsible-for-humans-big-brain/

Image: Pinterest

Can information escape from a black hole?

The superstrings are extremely thin energy fields. They are pieces of quantum fields. And the wave-particle duality can turn those superstrings into particles. 

When a black hole stretches material it turns it into a superstring-looking form. But in that case. There forms an electromagnetic vacuum in the middle of that particle. 

When the pull of the black hole ends, that thing would remove the stretch of that material. That means the material can take back its regular form because both ends of that "spaghetti" pull them back together. 

Can information escape from a black hole?

It seems that this thing is possible. The information can escape from the black hole. There is a piece of evidence that one black hole spat out a star that turned into spaghetti and ate it three years ago. But how a material or information can escape from a black hole? 

The answer can be in the whirl that pulls information inside the black hole. When a star closes to the event horizon it turns into a spaghetti-looking formation. So the black hole stretches the star. And when the star's remnant falls to singularity, it follows the trajectory that looks like a whirl. 

After the information crosses the event horizon or the point where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light, falling material continues to travel by following the spiral track to the center of the black hole. There is the possibility that the spaghetti or stretched material would hover near the event horizon. In that case, the material is forming a string-looking formation. 

If there is a small gravitational vacuum or gravitational shadow above that string it may start to flow inside the black hole. In that case, the hovering string is the stable object. And if a black hole moves a small part of that string can go outside the main singularity. That forms the quantum protuberance that conducts energy out from the black hole. 

The black hole is like a yarn ball. Inside the event horizon gravitation, itself forms the string-looking formations. The massive gravitation pulls gravitation that is like radiation to string-looking structures. And sometimes one of those strings would go outside the event horizon. That forms gravitational flares that bring energy out from the black hole. 

In the most exciting models, the particle that orbits inside the event horizon could form quantum entanglement with another particle. That is deeper inside the black hole. The quantum entanglement is impossible to press to size. There is also no limit to quantum entanglement. 

So, when two particles are forming quantum entanglement through different layers inside black holes energy travels to the outer participant. Also, the energy channel between those particles acts like an antenna. If that energy channel forming by gravitational waves. 

Or gravitational radiation can push the other gravitational waves away. Gravitation acts like all other wave motions. And if the energy level of that kind of gravitational pillar is higher it repels other gravitational waves. If that gravitational or energy pillar forms from outside the event horizon, it conducts energy out from the black hole. 

That thing will extend the length of quantum entanglement. If that thing happens to a string-looking particle it can form an energy-low pressure above it. That thing can rise the particle through the black hole's event horizon. 

https://astronomy.com/magazine/greatest-mysteries/2019/07/19-can-light-escape-from-black-holes

https://www.livescience.com/black-hole-pukes-up-star-three-years-later

https://scitechdaily.com/most-extreme-wobbling-black-hole-ever-detected-exotic-phenomenon-predicted-by-einsteins-theory-of-gravity/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

The new sensors benefit information about living organs and quantum technology.

Image 1

Researchers found near atomic-scale detail in the mechanism of hearing.

Researchers found near atomic-scale detail in the mechanism of hearing. This allows us to create new types of sensors. Which are suitable for robots. Those systems make it possible to connect the microchips to the sensors of some animals. And those systems can send data on how those animals see and hear things. 

Knowledge of some senses and their interaction with the neural system is an important thing. The problem with small-size sensors and biological sensors is solving how the sensor interacts with electric systems. 

If researchers can someday build an artificial ear that works in the same way,  as the real ear by using similar biological systems. They can make new types of observations about noise. By using real ears. Researchers can test how disturbing or painful some noise is. But those systems can also connect with robots. 

Image 2:) 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-discover-mechanism-of-hearing-in-near-atomic-detail/amp/

The new quantum sensors are making a revolution in science. 

Researchers manipulated light on the nanoscale. And that works as a pathfinder for new type 3D screens and VR systems. This also makes it possible to create new scanners that can scan nanometer-scale structures. And that thing can be useful in the new nanomachines. 

But the ability to manipulate light in the nanoscale makes it possible to create a new type of sensor. If we think about the 100% reflecting mirrors and nano-size laser rays we could create a new version of the telescope, that observes gravitational waves. That kind of telescope might have a honeycomb structure where the extremely thin laser ray is jumping from the walls. 

And that thing makes it possible to create a laser ray that length is the same as the Ligo sensor, but the package can be more compact. The new type of gravitational sensor could be the cube where laser ray jumps between walls. If that kind of thing can be possible. The gravitational waves can benefit easier. Those waves can give information about things that are happening inside neutron stars and black holes. 

In those sensors, the quantum entanglements can make the things like laser rays.  Those systems can get an accuracy That is higher than ever before. Quantum entanglement acts like a laser ray. When energy hits it the sensor detects that change. 

The new quantum sensors can also replace the GPS. Those quantum sensors can be next-generation navigation tools. Those quantum navigation tools are still under research. 

The idea of those systems can be seen in image 2. There is a network of quantum transmitters at certain points on Earth, and the system detects the position of those transmitters. There is the possibility that the Earth's magnetic fields are unique a certain points on Earth. That thing can detect by ultra-accurate sensors. 

https://scitechdaily.com/breaking-an-optical-rule-engineers-manipulate-light-at-the-nanoscale/

https://scitechdaily.com/entanglement-enhanced-matter-wave-interferometer-now-with-double-the-spookiness/

Image 2:) https://scitechdaily.com/high-tech-quantum-sensors-navigating-when-gps-goes-dark/

https://onlyimaginationlimitsinnovation.blogspot.com/

Can M-type red dwarfs have habitable planets?

Artist’s illustration of a young red dwarf stripping away a planet’s atmosphere. Credit: NASA, ESA, and D. Player (STScI) (ScitechDaily.com/Discovery Could Dramatically Speed Up the Search for Extraterrestrial Life)

Young  M-type star erupts very often. And those eruptions can strip the atmosphere off their planets. But otherwise, those small stars are extremely long living. And there is always the possibility that those exoplanets could re-form their atmospheres. The reason for that is when an M-type red dwarf goes more mature. It turns restless. 

But young M-type red dwarfs are very active. And that makes forming life on their planets very hard. Also, the gravitation of a red dwarf is not as powerful as the Sun's gravitation. So if an exoplanet form too far from the M-type star it can just fly away and turn into a rogue planet. 

In this text, the main focus is on the forming of liquid water. That thing is one of the primary elements that make the form of life possible. The primary element in this process is that the temperature on the planet is suitable so that hydrogen and oxygen can burn and form water. 

When the planet is locked, there is the possibility that the heat of the star will blow its atmosphere away. The supermassive exoplanets or super-earth can also have oceans, but there is the possibility that those oceans are so hot that there are no lifeforms. When we are thinking about Gliese 436 B, an exoplanet that has hot ice on its surface. In that case, the planet's gravitation will pull water to ice. In those conditions, the gravitation denies the vaporization of the hot ice. 

There is also the possibility that some massive water worlds have conditions where there is ice on the bottom of the ocean. In that case. Massive gravitation with water pressure makes ice to the ocean's bottom. And if the ocean covers the entire planet. It acts like the gas giant's atmosphere. 

Gas giants' atmosphere rotates at different speeds in each latitude. That thing is visible in image two where you can see Jupiter and its stripes. The windspeed in each latitude is different. 

And that forms stripes in their atmosphere. A similar effect can happen in water planets' oceans if it covers the entire planet. That means there would be sectors where the water speed is different and that causes massive friction. 

And if the deep water layer covers the entire planet, the friction between different water layers will turn that giant ocean into an extremely hot place. And in the case of large super-earths gravitation will keep water liquid even if its temperature is far higher than the vaporization point on earth. 

Image 2 Jupiter is a typical gas giant. 

Those giant oceans are forming clouds and the nightside of the planet is freezing. So those things stabilize the temperature of that planet. But then we must realize that gravitation on that planet must be suitable so that the vaporization of water happens in the absolute right temperatures. That temperature is important for enzymes. Also, if the planet's gravitation is strong, it will pull the atmosphere to flat. Of course, the gas in that atmosphere is extremely thick.

But there is also a super-earth with no atmosphere for some other reasons. In the cases when there are exoplanets without water there are no clouds. And clouds are things that protect the planet's surface from powerful radiation. Also, the atmosphere transports heat to the night side of the locked exoplanets. And the gas layer will stabilize the temperature of the exoplanets. 

If a very young exoplanet goes too close to the M-type dwarf that thing can blow the gas layers from the exoplanet. The M-type dwarf is one of the most typical stars in the Universe. And almost all researchers said, that there could be no lifeforms on those planets. The reason for that is those planets are locked. 

But as we know, many variables affect the forming of the atmosphere. There is a time window when the water can form in the atmosphere of exoplanets. If the planet is too hot the radiation from the star can blow its atmosphere away. 

In the case that the planet is too cold. Water cannot form from oxygen and hydrogen. 

Image 3. Planet Mercury

So researchers think that M dwarf blows the atmosphere away from its planets that are in the habitable zone. So in those cases, the planets share the fate of Mercury. 

Planet Mercury is a very small planet. There is the possibility that Mercury ever had an atmosphere. The radiation pressure that comes from the Sun is higher than red, M-type dwarfs. The sun is a G-type star with a surface temperature of 6000 K. And it's much hotter than M- type red dwarfs. The surface temperature of M-type red dwarfs is 2,400–3,700 K. 

And an M-type dwarf is not anything like the Sun at all. It's far smaller and it's colder than our sun. So the data collected from the Sun should not compare with M-type dwarf stars. 

The solar systems of those stars are small. In the solar or stellar system of the Gliese 581, three confirmed exoplanets would fit inside Mercury's orbital. There is the possibility. That there are Earth-size exoplanets with an atmosphere around the M-type dwarfs. 

https://scitechdaily.com/discovery-could-dramatically-speed-up-search-for-extraterrestrial-life/

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/water-world-extrasolar-planet-loaded-hot-ice

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_581

Image 1: https://scitechdaily.com/discovery-could-dramatically-speed-up-search-for-extraterrestrial-life/

Image 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter

Image 3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(planet)

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Flaming plant in autumn.

That bush that seems flaming brings one interesting thought to my mind. Have you read the story of Moses in Holy Bible? If Moses would live in northern lands that kind of phenomenon when the colors of leaves turned bright in autumn could explain the "flaming bush" in which flames would not burn. There was no autumn in Arabia, so the explanation could be that Moses was from northern lands or somebody brought that kind of bush to Egypt. 

The image above this text portrays the bush in autumn. That image brings one thing to my mind. Some ancient people had an idea about autumn. 

The external heat forms life. It brings energy from the outside. If we think about the existence of the universe and material. We could deny the material's vaporization by replacing wave motion that travels out of it because of cosmic inflation. The thing that destroys material is the end of energy. 

So, if we want to stop material aging we should just pump new energy into those particles. But if we make that thing the end of the energy pump will destroy the material immediately. When a material's aging is denied by pumping energy in it, cosmic inflation causes the energy level material and its environment turns always be higher. 

And if the energy pumping ends energy travels away from the material at a very high speed. So if some living organism uses energy pumping, where electromagnetic radiation will use to keep them young and the energy flow ends. That causes that person turns to sand immediately if energy pumping continues long enough. 

And the internal heat destroys life. And that thing is true in the universe. The internal energy that pushes the universe larger will destroy it. If there could be an external power source the universe would remain forever. 

https://informationnevervanishes.blogspot.com/

Why is strong identification important in the world of the internet?

Strong identification is the term that means biometric recognition. In the network's world, everybody is at a distance of 15 seconds. That means we can make contact with people who are 5000 kilometers from us. But there is a possibility that this person lives next door to us. And that means we must be careful and think about what we are saying or writing on the net. 

But then we must realize that there are no harmless hackers. Even if, we think. That there is nothing to hide in our network. We forget one thing. Hackers can break into harmless networks to use that network as a platform to attack. 

The attack can be:

1) Attempt to steal vital information. 

2) Deliver propaganda and disinformation.

Both of those hostile actions can cause the internet will be closed. By connecting a cell phone to the Google account and using a cell phone-based login protocol the account's legal owner gets information if somebody tries to log in to that account without permission. The modern "watchdog" system tells if somebody tries to log in to the system without permission. 

The use of modern equipment makes those systems safer. And things like getting access to Facebook or some other social media accounts by removing the sim card from the cell phone is impossible. 

Hackers can use stolen social media accounts to send messages to the victim's children and ask if there is a paper in the parent's room where the password for some more important user accounts is. The message could be that "hi, I lost my just changed password, and that thing is in under my notebook would you send it to me". 

And then the kid sends that password. So we should teach our children that they should not give any passwords to anybody. Also, tell them that they should tell those kinds of attempts to their parents. 

That kind of attack by using social media to cheat other people to seek paper, where a user wrote a password and shares their data in SMS or social media message. Is a forgotten way to use social media in attacks. In that case, the attacker might borrow a sim card or telephone. That was left on the table after the workday. 

The user must always change the sim card's pin code. If the hacker has access to the office. There is the possibility that this attacker just asks for a new password for the boss' account by using those sim cards. Changing a sim card between telephones is not difficult. And if there is some kind of service for a certain telephone number, the hacker will use that thing for the attack. 

In every company are lists of clients' data. That data consists the contact information like telephone numbers that people like car mechanics can call when the car is ready. And there is the possibility that the hacker makes a social attack against the victim. In that case, the hacker might try to ask for the passwords for some governmental facilities. If their victim is working in those places. 

And how do hackers get that name? They might follow the list of lecturers in open lectures. There might read information like the ICT specialist of some data security company that is the military force's contractor or military forces itself. Then hackers will simply ask for the password. But another thing is that there are no safety data accounts. 

If hackers can break things like the recovery account of Google account, those persons might steal that user's identity. Hackers can steal passwords during lectures very easily. They can simply take a film of the hand movements of the victim. And then they can use slow motion to see where the fingers are on the keyboard. 

So how to act in those places? The best possible thing is to use a biometric login. That thing is impossible to break. And the second best method is to stay logged in. In that case, there is possible to download another browser where accounts' users are logging in to accounts. Then the person can make notes. And then uninstall that browser if that thing is unnecessary. 

In the same way, the person can open their account for lectures and other kinds of symposiums. If there is nothing important, that thing minimizes damages even if somebody steals passwords. Changing password often is not reasonable. Users must always write new passwords somewhere. And if that thing is some kind of paper, there is the possibility that the piece of paper will go to the wrong hands.

So when should a user change the password? When that person worked somewhere else than their own office by using a computer, that is not their property. They should change their password. But that thing is necessary only if the user uses a password. The keyloggers cannot break biometric sensors. And that means bimetric identification is the tool of the next generation. 

The thing is that reporters and great audiences should always know the connections of the interviewed people.

There is a link below this text to the article where the director of Labore says that reporters should know the connections of economists who they interview. This thing should escalate all actors who are working or interviewed in media. We know that connections in private and working life always affect people's way how they see things. And especially their way to tell about things. 

People's connections in the business environment are always things, how they talk about things. And that's why the connections that those specialists have should be mentioned. When some person works in some company. And then that person sees something that causes a conflict of interest between employer and superiority.  

In situations where the public benefit crosses the benefit of the company, there is always a possibility. That some people want to support the company. That way of thinking is one of the main problems in working life.  This thing pushes the responsibility to the shoulder of the boss. We are always responsible for our work. So we cannot push every problem to the boss. But if there is something wrong, we should tell our boss. 

And when somebody tells something in the media we must realize that those stories can be faked. When people are in a position where the salary is good they might not want to change their workplace. 

The TV interview is a good moment to show loyalty to that company. So the person will talk about things unilaterally. They refuse to see any bad things in their workplaces. And that is the reason why that kind of person should tell their connections on TV before the interview. That thing can tell why some people have certain opinions. 

https://yle.fi/uutiset/74-20002101

The shocking fact is that our brain uses quantum computation.

The thing, that makes our brains so effective is that they use quantum computing. So in our brain, chemical qubits are traveling between neurons. And that thing with the ability to begin the operation makes our brain so effective that the best quantum computers are losers. Our brain is an extreme tool that uses at least two speeds in computing. 

Fast-speed computing is basing the electric phenomena that travel on the axons' cores. And another version of computing in the human brain is the slower model that uses chemical or electrochemical qubits called neurotransmitters. 

The brain uses the electric mode to send signals to neurons on how they should handle the qubit or neurotransmitters. That is coming after the electric signal. The purpose of faster computing is that brain can use it in fast reactions. And the slower mode is used to analyze the data. 

The brain uses electric computing to ask what neuron has certain information. And when that information is found, the neuron creates the neurotransmitter. Also, there is the possibility that electric computing is meant to tell neurons what kind of neurotransmitters they must create. And that allows the system to start the data-handling process. At the same moment in multiple points of the brain. 

By researching the brain neurologists and computer experts can create faster and more powerful computers that can learn things similarly to the human brain. Those neural quantum computers can drive the most complicated algorithms. But they are more flexible and suitable for autonomous robots than regular quantum computers. 

When researchers know how the brain operates, they can model that thing to quantum computers. 

The human brain could be a model for quantum computers that can revolutionize robotics. If we want to make a human-looking humanoid robot that can operate on Jupiter, Saturn, and other gas giants' moons' surfaces we must make a system that is more autonomous than any other robot before. The system can use a hybrid system where the electric signals are controlling quantum routers, switches, and gates. 

These kinds of the system require lightweight powerful quantum computers. In those lightweight but powerful systems, the electric impulse tells how the system should route the qubit. So, at the first, the electric impulse to quantum routers and gates, and then those gates can drive qubits anywhere where the system wants. 

https://scitechdaily.com/shocking-experiment-indicates-our-brains-use-quantum-computation/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Machine learning can peer to the future.

We live in an environment that is the singularity of natural and artificial actors. Things like the internet are full of information that can be virtual or it can be real. But the internet has not removed our need to go out for work and keep our wealth at a good level.  While we use things, like activity sensors or GPS the internet collects information on how we act. 

Making a data matrix is an easy thing. If the data collector is the Ai. The system can simply follow the crossroads. And it can observe which way people are turning more often. 

By using AI, is possible to turn things like cell phones into speed-measuring tools. The system must know the distance between two landmarks like traffic lights. Then it must know what object it must follow. The AI can calculate the time that the device uses in that range. And that thing is telling the speed of the vehicle. If there are two cameras at a certain distance from each other. 

The system can connect data that those cameras are sending. When the car passes the first camera the system stores its registration number in the database. And when the second camera takes the picture the time between those two pictures is telling the speed of the car between those measurement points. 

The internet can connect that data as the matrix. That system can use that matrix to predict how we will react in some cases. When somebody says that AI is the most powerful thing in the business environment, I would say that the person is wrong. The most powerful tool is networked AI which can interconnect many systems like the spider's net. 

The AI can collect things like what kind of books person loans from the library. And then AI can compare that data with other customers. If there are very certain types of actors. That thing makes it the AI possible to make a profile of what kind of books, for example, typical economists are reading. 

If the AI has to access those person's working files. It can make the profile of what kinds of abilities have people, who are reading certain types of books. 

When we are using the net, everything that we are doing will store in databases. The information matrix that the networked AI can use is enormous. This makes it possible that AI can create the behavioral matrix of certain people like economists and military personnel. And then the system can create a model of how the average representative of that group acts in certain situations. 

The fact is that if some person would be a military man at a young age, and go to study things like economics when that person is older. That thing allows for making an information matrix of how the person will react to some situations. 

By using this method, where AI collects data during the entire human life, the system can make a model of what kind of solutions, as an example in military service economist makes. The same thing can use to hunt serial killers from the net. 

And, if those people make successful businesses or any other actions. That thing makes it possible to select the most capable people for company and military operation leaders. The system can calculate the average success of a person with certain background and education in every type of environment. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-use-machine-learning-to-peer-into-the-future/

https://designandinnovationtales.blogspot.com/

Dream of 15 min. towns. Can we make everything in 15 minutes?

Everybody knows the dream of 15 min. towns. In those towns, every service is 15 minutes trip away from home. But can we escalate that dream? Could 15 minutes city or 15 minutes urban area involve the idea that every service will happen in 15 minutes?

How realistic this model that everything happens in 15 minutes is? And could the most modern technology turn the global environment into 15 minutes entirety, where people can reach everything on Earth in 15 minutes? 

That means we would go to the doctor in 15 minutes. We are waiting for the doctor for 15 minutes. And then we spent 15 minutes in the examination room. After the doctor, we go to the drugstore in 15 minutes and after 15 minutes. We have medicines in our hands. Could that thing be possible someday? We can call that vision the 15 minutes society. Everything happens in 15 minutes. 

When we are building taller buildings. The reason for that is that price of land is high in urban areas. And we can make hybrid solutions for an environment where people are living in smaller areas. And shopping centers are connected to houses where people are living. That makes the use of time more effective. 

And when those complexes are ready that solution decreases emissions. But the problem is that people might not ever go outside. And in the most extreme dystopic visions, those shopping-center-home hydrides are turning to independent states. 

Maybe shopping centers are the service centers of tomorrow. And if the robots are making physical products people can work in the same building where they live and go shopping. There could also be things like public services like doctors. But of course, this kind of advancement means that people have fewer contacts with the outside world than ever before. 

If we have the internet. We can click ourselves to another side of the Earth. Of course, we are not physically in there. But we can use VR screens that are giving us a real-looking vision of the environment. But the problem is that we are selecting information. We must not read things that do not please us. And that means we are missing the information that can be vital.

But can we travel physically around the world in 15 minutes? Or travel to any place on Earth in less than an hour? 

When we think about things like hypersonic aircraft and hyperloop trains those things might transport us to any point on the Earth by using hypersonic transportation. New hypersonic systems use hydrogen fuel so they are not causing emissions. And the hypersonic VTOL (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) aircraft can take people to any location on the Earth in less than an hour. 

But the "magnet loop" train could be a more powerful and faster transportation system than any other transporter invented before. The magnet loop is a particle accelerator that transports the train inside the vacuum tube. 

The system uses magnetic levitation. And also magnets are pulling the train in that tube. Because there is a vacuum in the tube there is no friction. And that allows rising the speed of that system to be highly hypersonic. That kind of system can make it possible to make a new type of transportation that is faster than any atmospheric system before it. 

Metaverse is a masterpiece of art.

Art is a different thing from science. The purpose of art is to reroute our minds and create new ways to see things. When we look at things like the metaverse. Those things are the ultimate version of art. If we make the metaverse where people are flying between those 3D virtual spaces we can make the full-scale experience by putting the user in an underwater environment. And then that person can swim and use VR classes.

That thing gives the feel of fling to the user of that user interface. The idea of the metaverse is that there are rooms or virtual 3D spaces. And we can furnish those virtual rooms as we want. Those virtual rooms might have multiple user interfaces. And one of those rooms might be the shop where people can buy things. 

Another room could be access to the user interface that controls some chemical laboratories or robots that are operating there. The metaverse can make it possible to create virtual offices and other kinds of things. 

It's possible to connect the virtual metaverse with real life. And that thing may connect enhanced reality systems by using those virtual rooms. The operator can use those virtual rooms for making possible to control robots over the internet. The sensors of the robot can connect with metaverse servers. 

There is the possibility that every virtual room in the metaverse is a very accurate copy of real-life rooms or offices. When a person will step into the virtual room, that thing connects the person to the robot that locates in some office. Then the operator will use the robot as an external body. And make things like cleaning operations. And this kind of ability interests also military operators. 

And in those cases, the imagination is the limit. Metaverse is the art and that means a person can go to the surface of some imaginational planet by stepping into the virtual room. So by using those virtual environments the person can step on the surfaces of all known planets in the universe in seconds. 

Connecting the real-life elements to the virtual rooms makes it possible for the person can step onto planet Mars in seconds. The virtual room must just furnish by using images that are from the probes of the surface of that planet. 

Human brain cells that live in the dish learn to play pong.

"This is a visual representation of the simulated Pong environment where neuron activity is reflected in the tiles growing in height. Credit: Kagan et. al / Neuron" (ScitechDaily.com/Watch Live Human Brain Cells in a Dish Learn To Play Pong)

Ability to teach neurons living in the dish to play pong might not seem very impressive. But that kind of thing can make the revolution for the development of the next-generation microchips and therapy for neural damage. 

If medical staff can teach cloned neurons they can transplant them to points where the nervous system is damaged. The problem with neural transplants is that the skills of destroyed neurons are gone. So the ability to teach neurons is making it possible to give a new type of therapy for brain tumors and other neural damage. 

But the ability to teach living neurons on a dish is making it possible to create new and powerful tools for controlling computers. Those tools are half-organic microchips where living neurons communicate with silicon-based microchips. That thing makes those systems very flexible. 

If the new skills will transfer to neurons by using synthetic EEG pulses. That thing makes it possible to create a new type of flexible processor that allows the systems to operate more independently than ever before. And of course, those neurons require nutrients. 

So there is the possibility that those microprocessors are connected with cell cultures where is some kind of algae or bacteria that can feed the organic part of microchips. Maybe in the future, the user of the computer must feed those processors by using sugars and nutrients that keep those neurons alive. 

https://scitechdaily.com/watch-live-human-brain-cells-in-a-dish-learn-to-play-pong/

Image:)https://scitechdaily.com/watch-live-human-brain-cells-in-a-dish-learn-to-play-pong/

By the way...

Maybe people of tomorrow can learn new skills by using implants that are put in the nose or the system can also stress the acoustic nerve. The nanotechnical submarine can easily swim in the nose or ears of the targeted person. 

Are you heard of so-called UFO implants? Those implants are mysterious systems that are in the nose of the person. The thing, that makes them mysterious is that the person doesn't remember to put them in the nose. 

There is introduced a theory that those implants are copying memories of the person to cloned neurons. And those implants are giving an idea that in the future. The person can learn also new skills by using that kind of implant.  

Those implants can use the blood of their hosts as a nutrient for those living neurons. The system drives new skills to those neurons in those implants in the form of the EEG. And then that EEG will be driven to the brain through the olfactory coil. That thing makes it possible to create a new way to transfer memories between people. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/biohax-uk-businesses-microchip-implants-employees-2018-11?r=US&IR=T

Image: https://www.businessinsider.com/biohax-uk-businesses-microchip-implants-employees-2018-11?r=US&IR=T

We all live in some kind of Plato's cave.

Plato's cave is the symbol of selective information. When those people sat on the floor of that cave, they saw shadows on the wall. And because those people had no other information than shadows on the wall. They believed that those shadows were the only reality that exists. 

But we are living in metaverses and the internet. How can we say that we are living in Plato's cave? We are searching the internet and looking for information that supports our ideology. Or we are searching for information that makes us friends with somebody we respect. 

So if we are using large data masses we can say that we are using multiple sources. But the problem is that all information that we are looking supporting one kind of agenda. And we have no ability or will to search for the things that are against the opinions that we want to hear. We don't want to hear or see things. 

That is against something that we used to think of as one truth. When we must not hear or see things that are not pleasing us we can pass those things. Willing to use the internet is voluntary. So who wants to hear or see things that force them to change their opinions? 

People must just find things that please them. And that means even a large number of data will not cover the entirety of that data and involves only one side view of things. When people are willing to get the information there is only one side which means that the person is in Plato's cave. 

A large number of one-sided information makes only a larger version of Plato's cave than the smaller number of information sources. So we have more information than ever before. But we use that opportunity to make larger caves where are more shadows. Or maybe somebody brings some tree to some corner of our cave. And that thing tells that there is some kind of plant. Maybe that plant is a juniper. 

But the fact is that one juniper is not all plants. And that one plant does not give the full image of the entire forest. If we want to make research about the entirety of the forests we should not make our conclusions by using some special tree that lives in a special place. 

Junipers do not grow in all forests. And that means one special case can turn the research upside down. We can believe that all forests are full of junipers. This is one thing that causes problems with the research. They are full of unique things. 

Avenue of Juniperus chinensis (Wikipedia)

But they are not showing the entirety. If some people are talking about forests they should not select one certain tree to the point of observation. Or if those trees are in some park, can we say that the park is the typical environment for that tree? 

Same way if the researchers are searching for things like magnetars that are super fast rotating neutron stars they can, of course, focus on one certain magnetar. That research gives very interesting data about the behavior of one magnetar. 

But that thing will not tell about what kind of magnetars usually are. And then we must ask one question: is that magnetar the typical representative of the magnetars? Or is that magnetar some kind of special case like the creator of the FRBs:s (Fast Radio Bursts)? Or are all magnetars create the FRBs? 

Well, we always select the information that we want to see. One of the reasons for that is that we are so busy. If we want to get information and deep analysis of that thing. We must use multiple sources. And that thing takes time. So we are looking at one source or maybe we trust that the article's writer checked sources and that's it. We have no time to spend all the time for checking sources. 

Sometimes we all write things that sources are not checked as they should. One of the reasons for that is public opinion. That's why we don't dare to write some things by using a critical writing style. We are afraid that public opinion turns against us. Or maybe we have no time to check the information that feels meaningless. 

When we are at work we read and select the information. That is useful for our work. But does that thing take us away from everyday problems? Or maybe that thing means that there is a dead sector in our life. That means there are always sectors that involve information that could help us, or involves important things. 

If we are thinking situation where we are sitting in our home. And see virtual images of some tropical lands. We can see multiple things in those images and films. But we cannot feel temperatures and other kinds of things that are involved in real experiences. 

A metaverse is a fascinating tool that will revolutionize the business environment.

Innovation is the key element in the modern business environment. The metaverse is the place where the company can test its products without making physical models. 

The idea of the metaverse comes from the interface that can move the cursor that is visible on the screen. The idea is that the camera follows the laser point on the projected screen. And then that camera sends the information where the laser point is to the computer. When the person pushes the left button the will flash the laser. And the right button will flash another laser ray. That emulates the push of the right button. 

The camera will send information about those flashes to the computer. The same technology can work with HUD classes. The system must just be known what point of the image is in the certain point of HUD classes. The simplest way to make that thing is to use the camera that is inside the HUD classes. And then, the user can point the laser point to the wall. 

In the places like playing computer games or in aircraft where a static screen is in front of the operator can just turn their head and point the laser pointer at the right point of the screen. The WEB camera at the front of the operator sees when that person blinks their eyes. And that thing is translated as the push of the mouse buttons. 

When somebody creates things like the metaverse there must be some kind of motivation for that thing. The metaverse could be an ultimate platform that can use for multiple things. 

Mixed reality is the ability to interconnect the senses of robots to the VR systems. Metaverse is forming of stable and shared 3D virtual spaces. But the fact is that those virtual spaces can involve elements from real life. That means robots that are operating outside can send their sensory data to the walls of those virtual spaces. 

Or there could be an image of a virtual computer that screen connected to the network surveillance cameras. When a user travels in those virtual spaces by using an avatar or virtual body, that person can fly in that virtual environment. The virtual body can connect to the hologram and small drone that can give the image that makes the person the bird-perspective view and turns the user into a virtual superman. 

If there is a camera system. That follows the hologram. And a person uses systems that give the synthetic feel that thing can make those holograms ultra-realistic touch. When a hologram touches a wall or another hologram that system gives a feel of touch. The system requires four cameras that are around the hologram and interconnected with the server. 

Above the Compiz Fusion that user interface might seem cool in VR glasses, and maybe metaverse would look a little bit like this. The user flies in there and opens virtual screens. The person can make many things that are impossible in real life. If the metaverse is connected with clothes that are giving the synthetic feel of touch. That thing turns into another reality. 

Metaverse means one version of so-called mixed reality. That thing means the virtual reality that connects elements from the virtual and real environments. And that platform is the tool that can make it possible to put architectural plans in a position where they would be in real life. 

So people can see what the house looks like when it is ready. But metaverse can also make it possible to make new kinds of network business. When somebody buys clothes the system must just scan the person. 

That scanning can make by using a mobile telephone or drone that measures a person. The reason why the scanner system is somehow hard to use is that the trajectory of the drone or scanner must be stable. When the system finds what the person looks like. 

It can show the virtual image of how clothes fit the person. When the person buys shoes the only needed thing is to put the feet on the paper where are squares and the AI selects the right stuff from the warehouse. AI can be better for that thing than humans are. 

But the thing is that the metaverse is like the  2nd. life or some kind of game. There the businessmen can meet each other. That thing allows companies to make more and more customized products. 

In the metaverse, they can see immediately. What products that they are willing to buy fit in their environment? As an example, customers can scan their living rooms and see what the furniture looks like before they buy those products. 

When we are thinking metaverse as a possibility we must realize that it can offer a new type of virtual matrix for business. That virtual matrix is a virtual shopping center where people can see what things. That they will buy look like. But the metaverse offers possibilities far more than just to the business. It can revolutionize entertainment, social media, and science. 

By using the metaverse, the operators can drive miniature robots inside human bodies. It can use for controlling robots far away from the user. The metaverse is one of the most brilliant places where people can test their products and their abilities.