Cloud castles and reality.

 

What is reality? 

Above this text is the image that portrays a castle that is above the clouds. What if we spend our entire life in that castle?  What kind of reality is to those fictional isolated characters?  If all contacts with the other world are stories that visitors tell?

The big question about the universe is, could there be other universes? And the big answer is that we don't know, and probably, we never will know about that thing. So multiverse, metaverse, and parallel universes are theories, nothing else than theories. Some people are saying that our universe is typical. This question causes another question about reality. 

There are two types of reality. 

1) Confirmed reality

2) Not confirmed reality

We live in a universe that is the only known universe in space. We don't have any single observations about other universes. And we can say that we are in the "typical universe" because we cannot see other universes.

The situation, in this case, is similar when we are thinking case, that we are living in one room our entire life. If creatures never see other rooms, we can think that all rooms are similar. We might think that all rooms in the world are similar. 

There are similar types of furniture, and everything is similar. If our creature lives in that castle without ever seeing another castle or house that creature would think that the castle is a typical way to live. 

Of course, people who come outside can say that creature lives in some special room. They might say that we have different furniture than other people.  Before we start handling our hypothetical creature, and this isolated room and space, we must realize one thing. 

What people say is not confirmed reality. There is the possibility that the creature asks things from different people. That thing is confirmation. Otherwise, all of those people or actors are members of the same system. And they might have orders on how to answer something. So even large groups of people are not always speaking the truth. 

Truth is a subjective thing. Some armed soldiers might say that city is a safe place. 

And some children can say. That the same place is not safe. The reason for that is that nobody dares to fight with armed people. 

Things like feelings are things that are not confirmed. And things like people's position in the hierarchy affect the service and treatment that person gets. And of course, people are telling stories about things like bad spirits to living in forests to keep people inside the city wall. In the same way, people who are living in our hypothetical cloud castle can think that the world below clouds is empty. 

The creature could sit in just a lonely room or castle. And listen to things. Or maybe we should think that the creature is ourselves. What if we meet only certain types of people? We might think that those people are typical. And every other people are similar to them. 

If we spend our entire life above the clouds. Many regular things are unknown to us. Things that are common at sea level are extraordinary above the cloud level. 

We can hear things like thunderstorms. We can see flashes of lightning. 

Or we can hear thunder and flashes. But we cannot see lightning itself through clouds. We see only light that the lightning sends. Maybe somebody tells that rain will make people wet. 

But we do have not any physical experience with those things if we ever come down through the cloud layer. We must know that there is a world below those clouds. But we have no physical observation about that thing we could only guess what the world looks like. 

We can go into that room and tell many things about cities. But the creature cannot confirm those things. 

Only personal experience that comes from all senses is the thing, that can confirm reality. 

If a creature (or we) just hears something. That thing causes inadequate observation. We can hear things, like a rustle in the wall, and there could be some creature like a mouse. But there could be some kind of twig that causes that sound.

Confirmation requires personal experience. If the experience is not coming from all senses the experience is inadequate. We need all our senses to confirm reality. 

Today borders are higher than ever before. Or are they?

Many people believe, or think, that national borders are the only borders in the world. The highest of all borders is the economical border. Even though we live in republics, we all have the right to go to school, and we are all equal people at the front of the law. We are facing economical inequality. 

When we are thinking about social inequality. We must ask: is that some kind of new thing? Or are people aware, that there is some problem with our beloved society? When we think about average salaries there are high-class directors whose salary is far above the average worker's salary. 

Even if we are not a class society where some kind of background guarantees some kind of position, we must realize that people who are born into wealthy families have a better chance to get better positions in working life. They know more high-class leaders who are offering better positions to those people who know more leaders. And people who have high positions in companies offer higher positions for employees. 

But even if the noblemen or noble person's dispensations were discontinued. The land was still in hands of noblemen. That meant that, especially in England, those people earned lots of money at the beginning of the industrialization era by renting their land for factories. The ownership of land offered very big incomings to people who owned it. And that thing caused that capital stayed in the hands of noblemen. And that formed the new term "idle upper class". 

Wealthy businessmen worked with noblemen to make money. And that social network formed the new upper class. 

Big ownership brought more money. The reason for that was that wealthy people visited similar events. And in those hobbies, those people could form a network with similar people. 

And that inspired Karl Marx when he created his "Accumulation theory". The economic accumulation theory meant that capital accumulates in the hands of people who already have the capital. And the reason for that is that wealthy people are knowing each other. So people who have capital also accumulate in the same rooms or events. People are surrounding them with people, who have similar opinions. 

And that is problematic. The people who have a membership in the "idle upper class" knew each other from childhood. And that made outsider hard to join that group. People who knew each other from childhood had their own stories. They always talked about their own business. And that caused a situation where people like Marx felt that they are outsiders. 

The problem is that there are still attitudes that wealthy people must keep their level. People who have expensive clothes are something else that people who have lots of money want to see. The social accumulation where people already know together makes outsider hard to join the group. 

A successful business requires good networks and good relationships. Without relationships, nobody buys new products from start-up companies. The networking with right people who can buy products is the thing that makes business. 

We might think that people who are similar to us are cool. And people who are different than us are "lol".  

The thing that caused the hate between the high- and working class were the expensive things. Or we must realize that if a person is wealthy something expensive for the worker is cheap for that wealthy person. Because high-class people are isolated behind their fences they heard stories about dangerous streets. So that caused the need to isolate more and more. The businessmen didn't want. That their families knew that they just kicked workers out of their company. And the same way those people who kicked off their homes. 

When some bosses kick workers off, they told stories that made them look innocent. The stories that were told were, of course, that workers just didn't do the job. And then the superior just told the person to go to find another job. That kind of thing was water for the agitator's machine. Agitators repeated that great injustice is done. 

The reason why communists wanted to please workers was simple. Workers were a bigger group than high-class people. So for agitators, the workers were better alliances than some high-class people or businessmen, who made big money from factories. 

Today in some cases. People can check things from surveillance records on the net. But before the net people must trust or not trust the stories that the participants are telling. The net has brought surveillance in the cities. It also offers a channel where people can tell their opinion or viewpoint of things. But the problem is how to prove things that people are saying. 

Agitators always wanted to believe workers. The fact is that the worker was not always innocent. But the conditions in the working class were not as good as they should. Social problems caused high-level crime statistics and conditions in some homes were horrible.

The world is in the deepest crisis in its history. But why is this crisis so deep?

Is the world really in crisis? Or are we realizing or understanding the crisis in new ways when the internet brings them even into our bedrooms? 

We all say that the internet brings crisis to our living rooms. But does the internet make the crisis more difficult to handle than they were before the internet? So is our world in its deepest crisis? Or have we just become aware of the crisis? That is an interesting question. How would we manage a crisis like the war in Ukraine? 

Otherwise, the internet is bringing new and powerful changes to society. The problem is that the Internet is causing turbulence. And nobody can control this kind of change. So managing this scale of change is impossible. Legislation is behind technical advances. And there are billions of users of international networks. But the international networks are also giving the possibility to deliver false information. 

And one other thing that makes the Internet different than any other information delivery tool is that we can see only things that we want. We can close all other opinions except those supporting us, out from our social network. We can say that those people who don't like the same things as us are lol. They are boring, they don't wear the same clothes as we like. Or they don't like the same music as us. So we don't have to listen to those people. 

What would the media tell us about the Ukrainian crisis if we would not have internet? Would we just accept the Russian military actions? And just say that "there is conflict in Ukraine", and then start to look at football? The internet makes people aware of a crisis like the Syrian civil war. 

That kind of situation. Where one of the world's largest military powers involved in internal conflict ever introduced great public. 

At least in the same volume. There were many weaknesses in the Russian military, and one of those weaknesses was the lack of high-accurate smart weapons. That forced Russia to use the TOS-1 thermobaric ammunition which caused lots of civilian casualties. The Russian operation was not as successful as it should. 

And Russian way to use firepower caused lots of casualties and if some western commander would make those things that man would sent to court martial. But Russian commanders must not care about the civilian casualties. And Syrian leaders accept all of the actions the Russian troops made in Syria. And Russia believed that the same tactics are effective also in Ukraine. 

That thing is one of the most interesting and same ways dangerous things. Political leaders must listen to public opinions more carefully than ever before. So crises and actions in those crises cannot hide from the great public anymore. Or the government must use high-class censorship.

And that is against western principles. In the western world is one holy principle. Everything that is not prohibited is allowed. 

Things like energy crises are at the door. And the new thing is this. We have no chance to replace the energy with other deliverers. We must accept that energy is one of the most powerful weapons against western infrastructure. So if we will buy natural gas or oil from some nation, we must understand that those things are not just trading. They also have high-class political dimensions. 

The conflict in Ukraine makes this problem deeper than ever before. If we do not support Ukraine, it means that Putin will get the green light for the next steps in Western Europe. Europe must therefore stand strong and defend its values. But one of the European values is its largest Achilles' heel. One of our most important and finest values:  freedom of speech is one of the most dangerous tools in the hands of populists.

We always believe that nations or governments are punishing people who threaten others. But nobody even imagined that threatening individuals. Net bullying, and propaganda. Are supported by some governments. I always wrote that people must use many sources for making their opinions. In that case, people must find many viewpoints. 

But what if some government and its media are full of bullshit? What if the official media. Which is a trusted source in Europe and the Western world is a pure propaganda channel? What if the media's function in some countries is only to support the government?

We must realize that the internet caused an information revolution. But there must be rules in there. We know that net bullying and disinformation must delete from the net. But the difficult question is who defines what is disinformation or what is bullying? This is one of the most difficult questions in the world. We know how the Russian government defines those things. 

Things like one-sided information are dangerous. And things like Russian support for Trump's election campaign and Brexit news were highlighted only what benefits that thing brings to Britain should be warning signs of what we must beware of. We must remember that there are people who get very much from dictatorial countries. There still are people in the east and west who wants to return to the iron curtain. The iron curtain was the line between East and West. 

People like KGB agents could make big money by introducing western businessmen to their colleagues. They offer cheap wood and raw material to western businessmen. And if those products were made in the Soviet Union. It offered cheap labor. 

But there is one other thing that this thing allowed. That was money laundry in the Soviet Union. 

People could carry dollars to the Soviet Union. Then they could change that money to German Marks, British Pounds, and other currencies. And then they could return that money to the west. That money made the Russian mafia a very powerful organization. The reason why the KGB didn't want to stop that thing was simple: it needed western money for its illegal operations. 

The Euro or the common currency in the European Union made that money laundering impossible. There was only one currency. That made it impossible to exchange the dirty money for Russian Ruble. And then rechange those Rubles for multiple western currencies. 

What do you think about reality?

 What do you think about reality?

In the past, reality just was. Term reality meant the observations that our senses sent to us. And we believed that reality was stable. And it was the same for everyone. Then we realized the differences in our senses like color blindness. But also, differences in our experiences adjust the way we see things. Things like feelings are modifying our way to see reality. And that thing means that reality is not stable or static for all of us. 

Things like feelings are ordering who we are feeling certain things. Feelings are subjective things. The experiences are making something very funny, and positive things to somebody. But then another person can feel the same thing very negatively. 

When somebody feels falling in love is a very positive thing. There is one person who might feel that thing very negatively. And that is the ex-lover of our new honey. 

In the past researchers thought that somebody just fell in love. But modern neural scientists are researching what kind of effect causes that thing. Why some people just fell in love? Or why do some people buy things, that they don't even need? What is the neuro-effect behind the things that something that person sees turns so attractive that the person cannot resist it?  

One example of that case is a customer who goes to a shop and buys something very expensive products. That the person uses only once. But that thing is only "need to get" and there goes lots of money. And why do some people go to a slot machine and then put their entire salary into that machine? Why do they think? That they will get a very good profit from that machine? 

Modern science tries to find the neural and neurochemical background for some behavior. And the most interesting question is, what launched that effect? There was some kind of sense, and then the neural chemicals started the interaction, which was against all logic and nonsense in many ways. 

Memories that are connected to senses are making feelings. So in that way, thinking of reality is always a subjective experience. 

In the past, people who worked with neural interactions said that people are interested in things. That thing means that interest was enough. And the effect that caused interest came outside the object. So that means everything that people see is real. But is it like this? We can say that things like holograms are causing questions about reality. But is a hologram only a virtual thing? Before we touch hologram we cannot say. Is hologram real or not? 

Holograms are forming a new version of reality or existence. 

That thing is virtual existence or virtual reality. Hologram-capable projectors can project houses to fog.  

Holograms can form a collective virtual effect. 

The VR glasses and other VR stuff are forming subjective experiences. But holograms are forming collective experience. 

Otherwise, developers can make holograms by using infrared frequency. And if that infrared radiation might have a high energy level. So that means the hologram can burn things that are touching it. 

So we can think that holograms are forming a thing that we can call "sliding reality". The hologram could be virtual reality. But it can slide to the interacting state of the objects. And one version of reality is the interaction between objects. 

Theoretically, we could raise the energy level and number of photons in the hologram so much that it transforms real kinetic objects. The idea is that the high-power energy just turns the photons into their waveforms where they are free superstrings. And then those pieces of wave motion turn to quarks and hadrons. So theoretically is possible to transform holograms into real objects by manipulating the wave motion. And transform that wave motion to the kinetic object. 

This is one version of reality. And maybe we can say that reality always exists. Even if we cannot see it. 

When we think about things, like the Internet. Those things are the worst tools in the wrong hands. But who is the worst selector in the world? We are the people who are using the worst censorship in the world. The target of that censorship is we. We don't want to hear people. Whose opinions are different than our opinions. So we just close those people away from our social network. 

Things like Facebook and some other social media networks made lots of work that the users feel good. They must always have fun. And "fun" means that all different people who have no similar background or opinions as we have are closed away from our social network. The false world is the place where are only nice and cool people. Everything that is shared is positive. But in the real world, there are also many negative things. We cannot just love and feel nice. 

There are also bad days. And we must also handle negative feelings and thoughts. We must realize that if we close some "not cool" people away from our social network that would not turn that person not existed. That person still exists. And maybe that user tries on the social network by using a fake identity. Some people are curious characters. And they are sneaking around to find out what other people will write and read about them. 

The reason for that censorship is the attitude, that we must not hear anything else than things that are pleasing to our opinions. 

If somebody has opinions, about what we don't like, we just close them away. We have the right to do that thing. The reason for that is that we must only hear things that please us. 

The Internet is the best information deliverer in the world. But then we must realize that internet is the best place to get the one side information. People are choosing similar people as they are in their social network. And that means people hear only opinions. That supports their opinions and attitudes. People see only things that please them.

The standardized probability variable and its role in the study

We are all heard of the standard probability variable. But many people do not know what this thing means. The "standard variable" means the criteria used for choosing the participants or actors for research. The ability to handle those variables is the thing that gives results to the researcher. 

When the researcher makes research. One of the key elements to getting real information out from research is to know what those "standard probability variables are". The researcher must know the research team's criteria for selecting the sample. That is under research. When researchers are researching things like viruses they must realize one thing. 

HIV infection makes all organisms dangerous for those patients. Same way. That is one version of the co-effect that boosts the effect of the primary variable. 

In COVID-19 statistics the primary variable is COVID-19. But co-variables ("booster variables") are HIV infection or weak immune defense. 

 If the patient uses an immune depressant. That makes all viruses dangerous for those people. Those medicals are causing chemical AIDS. And they are used with organ transplants to deny immune reactions. 

There are many ways to report deaths about COVID-19.

*Researcher can report all victims. That is dead during the pandemia and use the COVID-19 antigens as criteria. 

*In that case, we can say that if a person has a COVID-19 infection. And get under the car is dead because of COVID-19, which is not true. But if the criteria are only COVID-19 antigens the statistic shows that the person died because of COVID-19. 

*Researchers can report only cases that are dead because of COVID-19 infection. But in that case, we must check things like HIV infection.

*Researchers can also involve things like hospice or cancer therapy or the use of narcotics in those research. Or researchers can bypass those things, and that thing can affect results. 

How to select a sample is a problematic question. When we are thinking about the changes in the brain structure of COVID-19 patients, we must notice some other variables in the research. Those variables are lifestyles, use of alcohol, and use of narcotics. 

And many other things that can affect the metabolism and especially neuron metabolism. Those things are playing a key role in the co-effect of virus infections. 

https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/what-is-statistics-what-are-statistics/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Could gravitation form when quarks are moving back and forth?

There is one forgotten version of the gravitation theory. The idea in this theory is gravitation forms when particles inside protons and neutrons oscillate. When the size or the distance of those particles changes. That thing forms an effect that is like a pump. So the gravitational effect forms when quarks are moving back and forth inside their quantum field. If that movement forms gravitation, it will explain things like gravitational waves. 

When the distance of quarks inside protons and neutrons expands, that motion forms quantum low pressure between those particles. That low pressure causes the electromagnetic- or quantum fields are dropping between those particles. So could that thing be gravitation? That explains why planets are the gravitational centers. 

There are lots of protons and neutrons. And when the quarks that form those particles are moving back and forth that thing causes an electromagnetic pumping effect where the force of the quantum field between those particles changes. 

When those quarks are closing each other they are forming a standing quantum wave between them. And in that case that virtual particle will send wave motion or gravitational waves to the universe. That thing explains gravitational waves. 

The mystery of gravitation is an interesting thing. There is a possibility that mysterious gravitons are only oscillating quantum fields. When the size of the particles is turning smaller. That thing also causes the position where escaping quantum field forms the electromagnetic low-pressure zone that pulls quantum fields to that particle. 

The pulling effect of the gravitation forms. When the particle rides with wave motion that falls to the gravitational center that model is true. The gravitation effect is similar to other fundamental forces. 

That means electromagnetic wave motion travels through a hole that is in the middle of those three quarks. That means those waves are traveling in and out from three quarks. And the incoming electromagnetic field or radiation forms the cone that causes scattering to the outcoming electromagnetic field. 

The idea is that when the distance between those quarks increases that pulls the quantum field through it. That quantum field continues its journey. And the same effect happens on both sides. There is the possibility that the impacting electromagnetic or quantum fields are forming a quantum bubble in the middle of those quarks. 

That bubble pushes radiation away from it. Around that bubble is forming an area that is at a lower energy state than the quark. And that forms bridges or gluons between those quarks. The outcoming energy can travel between those bridges. And maybe that is one form of gravitation. 

The thing that might make photons unique is that they are somehow slight. Maybe the thing that explains the photon's speed is that the particle's quantum field somehow pulls energy inside it as much as it delivers. The interesting thing is that the speed of light is lower in the medium can be explained in this way. 

The medium pulls the energy away from the photon faster than a vacuum. But fast-moving particle replaces the lost energy. In a vacuum, the photon travels at the same speed as wave motion. So because quantum fields cannot fly out from photons. That means those particles' speeds will not decrease. 

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Object's movements or the size of the object can be physical or virtual.

In the real world particle or objects can travel in four directions. It can travel horizontally or vertically. Horizontally object's distance from the observer can increase or it can decrease. And vertically, objects can move up and they can move down. So when an object travels in space it can travel back and forth in every direction. 

Of course, all movements are not traveling at 90 degrees angle. There are intermediate forms of those directions. The thing is that motion can be physical or it can be virtual. When the camera zooms on an object, that causes the virtual motion. The object seems to become closer but the observer would not move. Or the object doesn't move either. 

And that means in real life. We should say that object has four main directions and multiple intermediate directions. When it travels in 3D space. 

When an object travels up it loads energy in itself. And when it falls it releases its energy. 

In the image above you see how the distance affects the observer. The objects near us seem to be bigger than the objects that are in long distance. That means the object can be virtually larger than some other object. 

The observation sector turns broader when the distance to the object increases. And that makes the object seems smaller. When an object is closer the observation sector turns thinner. And the object's size compared to the sector increases. 

That effect is visible when we look at the image. That portrays a needle and camel. We know that camel is bigger than a needle. But because the needle in the image is closer to the camera. That thing causes perspective where the needle is virtually bigger than the camel. 

Or do we know that? We only think that there is a needle. There is a possibility that there is some prop. That is meant for some commercials. And if that merchandise is some kind of prop it can be larger than a camel in real life. In that image, we see a thing that just looks like a needle, and because there are fingers we think that there is a needle. 

But what if we cannot see fingers? What if we just see only the needle head? That means we just believe the object that we see. Is some kind of needle. We have the right to believe that the needle is a needle, but it can also be a prop. Because we cannot see the entirety, we just believe something. 

In the case, where we cannot see the entire needle, we can see only the part of the object. And that missing part is the most important thing in the analysis. That kind of thing is making research difficult. We cannot confirm anything else than what we can touch or see. We can see only a small part of the system. And then, we can believe that all systems are similar. 

The problem with small systems' manipulation is that energy affects them globally. In global effects, the effect affects the major part of the system. We can make hydro plants that are forming electricity. But it's much more difficult to make quantum computers. Making qubits requires that researchers can manipulate a small part of the electron. And that requires very high accuracy. 

We can see some small systems like a puddle on the streets. And because the puddle is forming of water. We can say that the puddle is similar to the Pacific ocean. And the reason for that is puddle is forming of water. And water molecules are similar. So a puddle is formed by water. And water is the element that unites puddles in the ocean. 

Those water molecules can someday be in a large ocean. The fact is a puddle is in many ways similar to the ocean. But the ocean is far more massive than a puddle. Things like sea currents are not possible in small puddles. In small-size systems, the disturbance is the thing that denies the long-term flows and whirls impossible. 

Also, puddles are vaporizing so soon that they cannot form anything stable. There is also vaporization in oceans. There is lots more water that vaporizes from oceans than from some puddles. The thing is that the ocean is so a large system that vaporization has no visible effect on oceans. 

That shows how the size of the system affects the force of the effects. In small systems, small actors can cause global effects. When force affects the system it starts to affect it locally. But if nothing resists that force small effect can turn global. In global effects, the effect affects the entire system. 

If we throw a stone into the bucket. That causes a wave that travels through the water until it faces the wall. The small stone causes a big effect in a small system. But if we throw that stone into the ocean it would not that effect. The wave travels longer. But sooner or later the wave turns invisible. The reason for that is that the wave loses its energy. 

The thing is that even a small change causes a big effect on small systems. And that means everything is relative. If we move our hands in the sink we are making a wave. That seems impressive. That movement affects the entire system. But if we move our hand in the ocean that would not cause any visible effect. Or the effect is local. The force and size of the actor are the things that make affect globally. 

http://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2022/11/11/movements-or-the-size-of-the-object-can-be-physical-or-virtual/

The impossible triangle and energy flow make quantum armor possible.

Penrose's impossible triangle is the model of the problem of information travel in quantum systems. The energy must always travel to the side where the energy level is lower. And if we think that time is one of the quantum systems the reason why it's so difficult to receive information from the future is that future has a lower energy level than the past. 

So for traveling to the past. There must be a system that rises the information's energy level higher than the energy level at a certain point in the past. That allows the information to travel back in time. In this model time is one of the quantum systems. 

The particle or object travels in the three quantum systems. The distance to the particle is horizontal travel. The energy level is vertical travel. And then the object travels in time. So time is one of the quantum systems. 

Forms of photons such as wave motion and particles are one of the most interesting things in the world. That means photon travels in the form of a superstring. And energy cannot escape from the photon. That causes that time stands on that particle. 

Superstrings can also connect two quantum systems. Or two quantum systems can exchange information because they are part of a larger quantum system. The requirement that energy travels between two quantum systems are that those systems are connected. The connector can be the larger quantum system, where those two systems belong. 

If the energy level of participants of quantum systems is the same, that thing destroys the system. The reason for that is when wave motion that has the precise same forms (energy level and wavelength) impacts with other wave motion that pushes particles away from each other.

So there is needed a quantum system between those main systems. That increases the transmitter's energy level to higher than the receiver's. That thing makes time travel so difficult. The energy level must rise so that way it would not break information. The fact is that the information cannot vanish. It can break into pieces or be encrypted in a new form. 

This information helps to make stronger structures. If the energy level of all particles in a quantum cube (material) has the same energy level energy impact on that structure destroys it immediately. In quantum armors, there could be a network of the things like noble-gas atoms at the fullerene structure. In that structure middle of those noble-gas atoms is atom chains. That are forming quantum antennas between those atoms.

When energy impact hits those noble-gas atoms they send extra energy to those nano-antennas. The requirement for working nano-antennas is that the energy level at their top is lower than other structures. That allows energy to flow to those antennas and out to the system. 

The idea is similar when a particle slides from conditional space to absolute space. When energy starts to stress the structure the quantum antennas are transferring it out from the system. There is the possibility that the counterwaves are making the impacting energy weaker than it should be. When incoming radiation hits counter radiation it loses part of its energy. 

And that decreases energy stress on the structure.  Or in some other models, every particle in the quantum structure can have individual energy levels. That allows energy to fall to those lower energy particles in the case of energy stress. 

The thing that we must realize. That the end of the energy stress causes the wave motion. That breaks the structure. If there is space that allows the energy stress to rise without causing the wave motion that makes the structure more sustainable against the EM stress. If some particles in quantum structure have lower energy levels than others they can form cups where energy can flow when particles are sending electromagnetic impulses. 

If there are holes in the quantum entirety where energy can fall. That thing gives extra strength to that structure. In the case that the energy level of the system's participants is not the same. There are not forming identical waves that push particles away from each other. 

If some particles in entirety have lower energy levels than others. That offers the possibility that those lower energy particles can receive the energy impact. In the case that every participant of the quantum system has an individual energy level, the energy can travel to lower energy particles when those particles are sending the wave motion. 

Those lower energy particles offer holes where the wave motion can drop when energy stress to particles drops. Another way to minimize the effect of energy impact is to cover the most out layer of the quantum structure by using some other particles than another part of the structure. 

When energy impact hits those particles. They send energy impulses. And if that energy impulse travels through the rest of the structure. Without interaction. That makes the structures stronger against things like em-impulses. 

The particle travels in horizontal space where its distance increases. It travels at a vertical level which is the energy level. And then it travels in time. So time is one of the dimensions. But can we think of time as a quantum system? If time is the quantum system it allows information transfer to the future. But the problem is that the energy level of the information must rise. And the decoding of information can make that thing at least very difficult. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Populists and democracy: What is ordinary people's responsibility to their elections?

Ordinary people select people who are using power in parliaments. That means. Also, ordinary people have a responsibility to the state and its policy. Electors should listen to the candidates. Especially the entirety of the candidate's agenda should interest electors. So that they know who they will elect. The electors should elect a person who makes the best decisions. But who decides what is best for the nation? 

There is the possibility that some solution or decision is good for us. But that solution can cause catastrophe for the next generations. And that thing causes problems when we make decisions about the person who earns our trustworthy? And could that person be our election to parliament? We must realize that person who represents us in parliament makes decisions about how to use our money.

When some person represents us in parliament. That person would be in that position the next sessional period. And in that period. The parliament makes many more than just one decision. So don't look at only one statement. 

People should look at the agenda's entirety. And ask what that person wants to give to people. And what is that person's position on that agenda? 

People should know that parliamentary elections are not jokes. These people are selecting their representers to parliament for use of tax-payers money for a certain time. The problem is that there are no perfect candidates. All candidates have some things that do not please everybody. So whenever an elector makes choices they must make compromises. 

If good things >Bad things the candidate is positive. 

They must calculate Good things (minus) Bad things. And if good things win the elector chooses that person. If there is no candidate with more good things. And that thing is dangerous. If the candidate promises too much. That causes disappointment to electors. 

But also promises are compromises. The candidate must promise something to the main group of the constituency. And in some cases, the main group in the entire state is different than in the candidate's constituency. 

Individual constituencies may be home to unusually large numbers of super-rich people. And this can cause the candidate to have to please this minority. The candidate must therefore be in parliament as a representative of an economic minority. Every state always has a larger group of cleaners than managers. But in small constituencies, there could be more managers than cleaners.

 

In the world of the Internet, information travels faster than ever before. And that thing also causes problems with democracy. Populists are good to use social media platforms to deliver their agenda. They are offering lots of candies for people. And that makes them interesting in the eyes of other people. Also, some governments are using media as their tools. So in those states, the role of media is to support the people in power. 

When somebody promises lots of candies, we must ask how long people will live if they eat only candies. For living person must sometimes eat something else than just some candies. That means in working life. We must sooner or later do something that is not pleasing us.

Media plays a key role when information is brought to people. Of course, people like journalists have their own opinions. And in some cases, people like Secret Police agents are acting as journalists. 

In those cases, the information that is delivered can be propagandist. And the purpose of that news is just to support the political agenda of the people who are using power in some nations. 

The thing that can change information on one side or even propagandistic is self-censorship or the ability to black out other data that supports us or pleases us. When people are reading only things that please them that thing has a similar effect to propaganda. Self-censorship means that people read only things that please them. Those things are things that support their political opinions. 

We are wrong if we think that things like where companies make power or what power source those power plants use are not political decisions. Everything that used public money is politics. And we select representatives who represent us in parliament.

People argue that rulers have their responsibilities. But ordinary people also have their roles. In a democracy, they elect the people who make the decisions. The problem with the Internet is that people only choose the information that interests or pleases them. To get balanced information people have to listen to everything else that pleases them. And the ability to choose only things that seem pleasant to them makes information monotonous. People who deliver information have their supporters. And there are many ways to see things, that seem clear. 

 

There are four main types of governments 

• Closed autocracies
• Electoral autocracies
• Autocratic democracies
• Liberal democracies

Closed autocracies are nations like North Korea where the head of state doesn't even play democracy. 

In electoral autocracies is elections. But some non-democratically selected organization keeps the final control. Those nations are like Iran. There are parliaments but there are limits to the parliament's freedom to make laws. In those nations, the MPs or members of parliaments must follow strict roles in their work. 

In autocratic democracies is free elections. But things like the social environment and the common narrow attitudes make some people's life difficult. In those democracies, criticism against the parliament is not allowed during its sessional period. 

In autocratic democracies, people who criticize the parliament or government would be persecuted by media that support the party. That is in command. Criticizing the government can cause consequences like the loss of military rank. That kind of government is under the control of high-class populists. 

In liberal democracies, people are allowed to criticize governmental actors. That thing is so-called real democracies. In those things, the problem is that populists are using those systems for supporting their agenda. 

The problem is this. What if some solution that seems good in a short period turns or can predict to turn against people? What if the best for people requires sacrifices? Things like climate change are one thing that requires compromising on one's comforts like leaving the car to home. But those things are difficult because many people used to drive to work using cars. And changing attitudes is difficult because the car has an image of freedom and independence. 

But the car is also telling about social position. And public transport has the image of poor people's transportation system, which is used by people who cannot buy their car. The things like the high price of gasoline and energy crises. Along with the loss of capacity of parking areas are causing that we must re-estimate the role of public transportation. 

The science itself is not democratic. Scientific facts like Galilean moons are not following votes or elections. We can make as many votes as we want. But that thing doesn't affect those moons' trajectories. If we believe that democracy is turning science to state that it gives answers or solutions that please everybody we are wrong. We cannot transfer things like the planet's trajectory to please us by voting about them. 

But when we are thinking about the worst threat to democracy, we can say that is democracy itself. Populists are people who give great and simple promises. And if electors are not using critical ways to think. They would fall into the trap of populists. 

The best fellow for democracy is truth and a critical way to think. When we are seeing people who give simple and good-looking promises, we should ask at least a couple of questions about things that those people promise.

• If we make some decision, what happens after that? 
• What is those people's position in the new system? 
• Where do they get money for those projects?
• And then we should ask, why do those people want that change?
• And who introduced those things to those people? Or where do those people get their ideas?
• If we think of things like loan money from foreign lands. That requires that the state must pay the loan back.
•  Of course, the state can say that it will not pay that money back. But then the problem is how to get the next loan. 
• And if the multinational corporations are leaving the country. That causes problems with taxes. 
• If the country nationalizes that property, what happens to trust in that government? 
• Would somebody sell things like weapons to that nation? Or does the deliverer of the highly advanced weapon system allow the country to use its systems?  
• If the state nationalizes the property of an example U.S citizen? Is the use of GPS possible in that case? 
• And finally, if something changed, what is the thing that replaces the old thing? Where the investments that the old thing required will aim in the new system?

Sometimes people say that the media should ban far-right from the media. But censorship can cause those politicians to turn more fascinating than they are without censorship. 

And if those far-wing radicals are banned from the media. That gives them a chance to turn the focus from their political agenda. In those cases, discussions are turning into fights. And while people yell at each other. Nobody can ask about those participants' political agendas. 

They can say that other people do not give them a chance to talk or finish their speech. So then they can start to argue with others in some symposiums. And their agendas will not come to public knowledge. But people will know that those politicians are banned. 

And that thing is what they want. If the person is banned it allows that person can avoid questions of political agendas. They can discuss things and why they are not allowed to talk freely. That allows them to avoid critical questions. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Can a cat be dead and alive at the same time?

Image Wikipedia:Scrödinger's cat

If information ever exists. It cannot either vanish. If something vanishes it requires that at least information about that object exists. If something never exists. It cannot either vanish because vanishing requires existence...

The reason for that is simple. Only existing things can vanish. 

If we are thinking about Schrödinger's cat. And the box where that cat is put where the cat is in a position where it cannot release without killing it, we can say that at the same time cat is dead and alive. But the fact is that the answer to the question is the cat is dead or is it alive requires another type of logic. The particle can be in two places at the same time. Because of quantum superposition. But the particle can have only one existence if it will have existed. 

In logical quantum mechanics, the superposition means that the particle is in two places horizontally. But the energy level of those particles can be different. And that means the particles can be vertically at different levels. 

But if the particle is dead. It doesn't have existence. And that means the particle is meaningless. 

In information theory, the information cannot vanish. But if the observer doesn't have information. That makes information non-existent. Getting information makes it existent. But if the observer doesn't never get information about the things like a cat. The cat is dead.

 Because information never existed. It cannot either vanish. 

Information can change its form. in system theory, this means. The cat that carries information is living. And when the cat delivers its information it is dead. So if the cat serves some system as the messenger which carries some USB stick between two computer centers. That means the cat lives until it delivers the USB stick. 

If we think like that anything that means something to the system is alive. And if the cat doesn't have a message or it just walks on the streets it's dead. So living means that things have some kind of meaning to other actors. 

But information theory describes the existence that an object doesn't have the form of to subject before the subject sees that object. So the cat is dead for a person until that actor gets knowledge about the cat's existence. We all know that in our house can be a cat. But we cannot see it and because the cat doesn't cause any actions to us or it doesn't give any markings to our calendars that means the cat is dead. 

That way thinking only things that we know and things that causes interactions are alive. The form of the information can be virtual. That means even if the cat. That someday carried messages but then escaped and the observer never sees it again the cat is alive in its virtual form. Observers can discuss the missing cat. And that makes the cat still alive. Even without straight contact with the observer. The cat remains alive in the virtual mode in the memories of those people. 

So the cat's living or existence can be stronger or weaker. It depends on how often we see it, and how often we talk about that thing. Maybe we will tell stories of the lost cat to our grandchildren. And that keeps it alive in our memories or the virtual world if we want to call memories virtual projection. But memories are forming of real things. That means those tales about that cat are weaker existence than seeing a cat straight. Or touching it. 

Being alive=Being exists. 

Being exist= actor can measure an object. 

And then the actors know the object. 

Knowledge brings the object to reality. 

That means until we measure or touch the cat. It would not turn into reality. 

That is one interesting thing. Before a person sees a cat it is dead because it is not part of reality. That means the cat or particle can be at the same time in two states but those states cannot be too far from each other. The cat cannot be alive and dead at the same time. That is a paradox as I wrote earlier. 

But a cat can be alive in virtual and physical existing modes. We can see the cat and tell about it to our mate, who stands near us. That means the cat has two states virtual and real to the system. But for individual actors, the cat can have only one state. They see cats and measure or they cannot see them. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/reality-doesn-t-exist-until-we-measure-it-quantum-experiment-confirms

The system slides from a conditional state to an absolute state. 

Conditional state>>>>>Information spreds>>>>>>>>>>Absolute state

Conditional state

Individuals of the entirety get information about the cat. 

Information spreads

In absolute state, every participant of entirety knows about the cat. 

The system slides from a conditional state to an absolute state. When the cat or information is between the states. It can have this conditional state. But sooner or later, the information must reach a stable state. Or if the cat falls between states it has the absolute state. The fall means that the absolute state changes very fast. But when the cat reaches the floor. It would reach the minimum energy level or state. 

"Being alive" for an object means that the actor can know about it. The knowledge of the actor turns it alive. 

"Maybe mode" is the mode where the same time cat is alive and dead at the same time. But when information spread in the system the system turns to Yes/No mode. 

That thing requires that there are multiple independent actors in the system. The system slides from the conditional state to the absolute model. 

When the first actors in entirety get knowledge of the cat's existence. There is the medium where the entirety has at the same time two states. But then the system will slide from the conditional mode or state to the absolute mode. When the system is in its absolute state form, the cat is dead or alive not dead and alive. 

An actor can be an individual. Or it can be a group of individual actors. 

All systems contain multiple actors. And if we think that group of people is searching for the cat and one sees it. Then that individual tells that thing to another participant that thing causes that cat to have two states virtual and physical in the system where are multiple actors. But the individual actor the cat is real or virtual. Or the actor doesn't know the existence of the cat. And that means the cat is dead. 

The actor can have three forms. Two of them are where the observer realizes its existence. And one form where observers don't know the existence of the actor. That is the dark mode that is hidden from actors. 

*Virtual form

*Physical form

*If nobody knows the existence of the actor, he's dead. 

The knowledge makes the object dead or alive. Being dead and alive are black and white. The actor can know the existence of the cat. Or the actor doesn't know that thing so the cat is dead. If the actor hears about the cat that thing makes it alive in virtual mode. When a person sees cats' traces. That will bring the knowledge of its existence stronger. And that will turn it more existing and more living than just talking about it. 

But a cat cannot be dead and alive at the same time. When people are talking about cats it turns alive. Because existing things are living things. The cat's existence can be virtual when somebody just describes the cat to others. Or it can be physical when the actor touches the cat. But in both cases cat is alive. The reason for that is that requirement for a thing's existence is that the observer becomes conscious of its existence. If a person doesn't know about its existence the thing is dead. The existence means that the cat is alive. 

When we think that a cat is dead or alive. We must say that for the system that is the entirety of multiple actors. The cat can be dead or alive. The individual actors can have different knowledge about the existence of the cat. In that stage, the system is in maybe mode. But when information about that cat's existence spreads. That system will turn to the mode. That allows it to get knowledge about the existence of the cat. 

The term dead cat means a cat whose existence is not known. Knowing the existence of the cat makes it alive. The cat cannot be dead and alive at the same time. The reason for that is simple we know that cat exists or we don't know a cat's existence. We cannot know and not know the existence of the cat at the same time. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/dont-let-yourself-get-tangled-up-by-these-4-quantum-mechanics-misconceptions

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/